Flameless combustion behaviour of preheated pulverized coal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A method for stable flameless combustion of pulverized coal based on coal preheating was recently proposed. The method involves the initial heating of pulverized coal to a temperature above 800 °C. The heated coal is then transferred into a combustion chamber, where it is mixed with secondary air injected at a high velocity to achieve flameless combustion. The flameless combustion behaviour of the preheated pulverized coal was experimentally investigated in a lab‐scale test apparatus. The results showed that stable flameless combustion of bituminous coal and two different anthracite coals could be achieved. The temperature of the combustion chamber was also observed to be homogeneous. The peak temperature was below 1250 °C, while the average combustion temperature was about 1150 °C. The normalized root mean square temperature fluctuation over the combustion chamber is 7.0 %, 6.7 %, and 6.8 % for the three different coals. The colour of the entire combustion chamber was a faint yellow with no obvious flame front surface observed. Fuel preheating was found to be effective for improving the combustion efficiency, with values of 99.2 %, 98.3 %, and 97.9 % achieved for bituminous coal and two different anthracite coals, respectively. The experimental data further revealed that the NO X emissions for all the considered coals were very low compared to the corresponding cases of traditional combustion, with the values for the different coal types also significantly varying. The NO X emissions were determined to be 232, 187, and 165 mg/Nm 3 (6 % O 2 ) for bituminous coal and two different anthracite coals, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".