MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Signal Processing for Fiber Optic Systems

2016· article· en· W2762982151 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Shao

Bibliographic record

VenueRecent Patents on Signal Processing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarization mode dispersionDigital signal processingModal dispersionFiber-optic communicationSingle-mode optical fiberOpticsDispersion (optics)Optical fiberSignal processingNonlinear systemElectronic engineeringOptical communicationComputer scienceDispersion-shifted fiberPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringFiber optic sensor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the digital signal processing (DSP) methods used in coherent fiber optic communication systems. With the advances in high speed DSP, linear impairments such as chromatic dispersion (CD) and polarization mode dispersion (PMD) can be compensated for using fixed/adaptive equalizers. It is also possible to compensate for the interplay between dispersion and nonlinearity by digital back propagation (DBP), in which the virtual fibers whose signs of dispersion, loss and nonlinear coefficients are opposite of those of the transmission fiber, are realized in the digital domain by numerically solving the nonlinear Schrӧdinger equation (NLSE). DSP equalization enhances the transmission performance and error-free reach of coherent fiber optic systems significantly. Keywords: Chromatic dispersion, coherent communications, digital back propagation, digital signal processing, fiber optic communications, nonlinear fiber optics, perturbation techniques, polarization mode dispersion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecent Patents on Signal ProcessingSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207