MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763009356 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.45aa

86 Latent Tuberculosis in Foreign-Born Children

2004· article· en· W2763009356 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kristine Fortin, Ana Carceller, M Robert, Valérie Lamarre, J. Bouchard, OM Dobrescu, MH Lebel

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatent tuberculosisTuberculosisMedicinePediatricsMycobacterium tuberculosisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains an important public health concern in Canada. In 2001, the incidence of tuberculosis in Canada and in Quebec was 6/100000. In Montreal the incidence was as high as 11/100000 with 80% in foreign-born residents. To assess differences between immigrant and internationally adopted children with latent tuberculosis infection. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all immigrant and internationally adopted children evaluated at the International Adoption and Immigrant Health Clinic of Sainte-Justine Hospital in Montreal between 01/01/98 and 31/12/01. Demographic data, anthropometric data, BCG vaccination, tuberculin skin test (TST), chest x-ray results, treatment and outcome were reviewed. Microsoft Excel Office XP was used for data compilation and analysis. Our population included 110 immigrants and 561 adopted children. Median age at evaluation was 5.5 years for immigrants and 13 months for adopted children. Twelve percent (77/671) of foreign-born children had a TST =10 mm. Of these 77 children, 42 had skin indurations between 10–15 mm while 35 had indurations =15 mm. Fifty-eight percent of patients had a TST <10 mm and in 30% TST results were not available. Thirty-three percent of the immigrant group and 13% of the adopted group did not have a documented reading of their TST. Thirty-eight percent (33/87) of all immigrants tested had LTBI compared to 10% (44/461) of all tested adopted children (p<0.001). When we excluded children who did not have the results of their TST documented, the prevalence of LTBI was 52% (33/64) in the immigrant group and 11% (44/403) in the internationally adopted group (p<0.001). All 77 patients had chest x-rays and none had radiological evidence of tuberculosis. One adopted child developed active tuberculosis after five months of isoniazid prophylaxis. All children received isoniazid, 75% of patients for 9 months and 86% for at least 6 months. Our study reinforces the importance of routine screening for tuberculosis infection in all foreign-born children. Overall, more than 50% of immigrant children have positive TST compared to 10% of internationally adopted children. Strategies for improving compliance with skin test reading in immigrant children are needed to insure adequate tuberculosis prevention. The high treatment rate with isoniazide prophylaxis illustrates the potential for screening programs to improve both child and public health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→