Automatic Temporal Segmentation of Vessels of the Brain Using 4D ASL MRA Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Automatic vessel segmentation can be used to process the considerable amount of data generated by four-dimensional arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance angiography (4D ASL MRA) images. Previous segmentation approaches for dynamic series of images propose either reducing the series to a temporal average (tAIP) or maximum intensity projection (tMIP) prior to vessel segmentation, or a separate segmentation of each image. This paper introduces a method that combines both approaches to overcome the specific drawbacks of each technique. METHODS: Vessels in the tAIP are enhanced by using the ranking orientation responses of path operators and multiscale vesselness enhancement filters. Then, tAIP segmentation is performed using a seed-based algorithm. In parallel, this algorithm is also used to segment each frame of the series and identify small vessels, which might have been lost in the tAIP segmentation. The results of each individual time frame segmentation are fused using an or boolean operation. Finally, small vessels found only in the fused segmentation are added to the tAIP segmentation. RESULTS: In a quantitative analysis using ten 4D ASL MRA image series from healthy volunteers, the proposed combined approach reached an average Dice coefficient of 0.931, being more accurate than the corresponding tMIP, tAIP, and single time frame segmentation methods with statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The novel combined vessel segmentation strategy can be used to obtain improved vessel segmentation results from 4D ASL MRA and other dynamic series of images. SIGNIFICANCE: Improved vessel segmentation of 4D ASL MRA allows a fast and accurate assessment of cerebrovascular structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".