MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763148256 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e59

70: Parent Reports of Stressful Experiences in a Shared Room Versus a Single Family Room NICU

2015· article· en· W2763148256 on OpenAlexaffabout
S Holbrook, Alexandra Howlett, Molly Hicks, Siddartha Buddhavarapu, Kayla Hart, Jacqueline Boulton

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreastfeedingAnxietyDemographicsDepression (economics)PediatricsObservational studyIntensive careNeonatal intensive care unitDemographyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alterations in the anticipated and expected parental role is documented as the single most stressful consequence of having an infant admitted to the NICU. Single family rooms (SFR) are thought to promote maternal bonding, breastfeeding and an increased sense of parental competency; with decreased rates of depression and anxiety. To compare parent stress, self-competency, and perceived quality of care in a shared (DB) NICU versus a SFR NICU. Parent perspectives were explored as a sub-study within a larger prospective observational cohort investigation of a NICU move from December 2013 to September 2014. Self-report questionnaires were administered over a one-month period in a DB NICU, and during a three-month interval in a new SFR NICU. The questionnaire contained items on spousal support and demographics and a compilation of scales including the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale (EDPS) and the Parental Stress Scale (PSS:NICU). Responses were compared using Pearson χ2 and Student's t-test. Eight families from the DB NICU and nine families from the SFR NICU participated. The majority of participants reported Caucasian ethnicity (75%), Canada as their country of origin (65%) and English as a primary language (70.6%). Mean age was 30.9 (6.5) years and over one-half (56.2%) of the subjects reported a family income >$100,000/year. Parents reported their time in the NICU as very or extremely stressful (76.5%). Overall scores on the PSS:NICU were higher in the SFR NICU than in the DB NICU (65.7 versus 49.1, P=0.03). On the EDPS, 76% of participants had scores consistent with possible depression however, there was no difference between scores in the DB and SFR NICUs (13.2 vs 10.3, P=0.18). There was no difference in parenting sense of competency between groups (83.3 vs 80.3, P=0.47). Although families reported higher levels of stress in the SFR NICU than in the DB NICU, it is important to recognize that this was a study of only 17 participants. Notwithstanding, research has shown that parents do feel more isolated from other families in the SFR units, which could conceivably lead to higher stress levels. Future studies should also include evaluation of peer support systems within the unit. Similarly, larger samples are required to control for severity of infant illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→