Genetic divergence among and within Arctic char (<i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>) populations inhabiting landlocked and sea-accessible sites in Labrador, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anadromous, resident, and landlocked Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) differentially experience drift and gene flow, making them ideal for studying incipient divergence. We investigated genetic divergence within and among char occupying landlocked and sea-accessible sites in Labrador, Canada, using 11 microsatellites. Unlike anadromous char, landlocked char were highly genetically differentiated. Genetic subgroups were detected within landlocked and sea-accessible sites. Within Ramah Lake (a sea-accessible site containing two subgroups), one subgroup matured at a small size, and both subgroups had equal proportions of males to females. These findings refute residency as a sneaker male tactic and instead suggest the presence of reproductively isolated resident and anadromous char. Subgroups demonstrated equal frequencies of Atlantic and Arctic lineage mtDNA haplotypes, suggesting their genetic differences were not due to allopatry during the last glacial maximum. Our results are therefore consistent with the sympatric genetic divergence of resident and anadromous Arctic char morphs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".