MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763173523 · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2759812

Maximum Torque Per Ampere Control for IPMSM Using Gradient Descent Algorithm Based on Measured Speed Harmonics

2017· article· en· W2763173523 on OpenAlexafffund
Chunyan Lai, Guodong Feng, Kaushik Mukherjee, Jimi Tjong, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsHarmonicTorqueAmpereHarmonic analysisGradient descentMathematicsVoltageComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMathematical analysisControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel gradient descent based maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) control algorithm for interior permanent magnet synchronous machines (IPMSMs) by using the measured speed harmonics. The proposed approach does not require machine parameters and thus is not influenced by the machine and drive nonlinearities. Hence, the proposed approach can ensure a robust MTPA control under different loading conditions. Specifically, in the proposed approach, a small q-axis harmonic voltage is injected into the machine to induce a small harmonic component in the machine speed. Based on the PMSM torque equation, the mathematical relation between the induced speed harmonic and the output torque is derived, which shows that the magnitude of the induced speed harmonic is proportional to the output torque of an IPMSM. Therefore, the speed harmonic is explored to seek the MTPA angle, in which the MTPA angle is found when the speed harmonic magnitude is maximized. In particular, the gradient descent algorithm is employed to detect the MTPA angle, which is computationally efficient and converges quickly. The proposed approach is evaluated with both simulations and experiments based on a laboratory IPMSM drive system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207