MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763182872 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e59b

72: Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Neonates <29 Weeks GA Treated with Inhaled Steroids for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

2015· article· en· W2763182872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edmond Kelly, Vibhuti Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Jody Levenbach, M J Vincer

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineCerebral palsyPediatricsBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentGross Motor Function Classification SystemIntraventricular hemorrhageGross motor skillNeurodevelopmental disorderRetrospective cohort studyCochlear implantCohortGestational ageMotor skillAutismInternal medicineCognitionPregnancyAudiologyPhysical therapyPsychomotor learningPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a major neonatal morbidity associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcome at 18–24 months of age. Use of postnatal systemic corticosteroids has been shown to facilitate extubation and reduce the severity of BPD; however its use is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment mainly cerebral palsy (CP). Inhaled steroids are used alternatively, but their effect on neurodevelopmental outcome is not well documented. To evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18–24 months of neonates <29 weeks GA with BPD who are treated with inhaled steroids vs. systemic steroids vs. no steroid treatment. This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) and the Canadian Neonatal Follow-Up Network (CNFUN) from April 2009 to September 2011. Neurodevelopmental impairment was defined as any one of Bayley III score <85 (cognition, motor or language), CP, or visual or hearing impairment. Severe impairment is defined as any one of: Bayley III score <70 for any of the three components, CP with gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) ≥3, severe visual impairment <20/200, or hearing impairment requiring aids/cochlear implant. Data for the three groups were compared using χ2 test and Student's t test as appropriate. Of the 4119 neonates born during the study period, 1339 (32.5%) developed BPD. Of the 1339 infants, 817 did not receive steroids and follow-up data was missing for 56 infants. Of the remaining 466 neonates with follow-up data, 63 received inhaled steroids, 403 systemic steroids. Adjusted OR (95% CI) for neurodevelopmental outcomes after adjustment for GA, SGA, outborn, mode of delivery, and SNAP-II scores are presented below. Table 1 In neonates <29 weeks GA who develop BPD, treatment with steroids is associated with worse outcome than those not treated with steroids. In comparing steroid treatment groups, inhaled steroids neither confers any benefit nor causes any harm compared to systemic steroids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→