MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763198146 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a9

Identification of molecular markers in Labeo rohita towards better carbohydrate utilization

2017· article· en· W2763198146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Parameswari Behera, Amarendra Kumar, Kiran D. Rasal, Lakshman Sahoo, Samiran Nandi, Jitendra Kumar Sundaray

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabeoIdentification (biology)Fish <Actinopterygii>BiologyComputational biologyFisheryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contribution of aquaculture products in providing nutritional and food security to human is increasing expeditiously with the increase in animal protein demand.Feed cost contributes more than 60% of the cost of aquaculture production.Henceforth, formulation of cheap fish feed is one of the greatest challenges in aquaculture industry.Carbohydrates are the cheap source of dietary energy.So their level of utilization in fish is an exciting area in research for decreasing the fish feed cost.Molecular markers such as microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) are used for genetic mapping, quantitative trait loci identification and genome-wide association studies in several aquaculture species.In this experiment, SNPs and microsatellite markers linked to carbohydrate utilization in Labeo rohita were identified.Liver tissue samples of Labeo rohita and Labeo bata were collected from individuals fed with a customized diet with 40% carbohydrate for a period of 21 days.RNA was extracted and cDNA library was prepared and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq 500 platform.7.5 GB of data was generated from each species.Assembly of rohu data resulted in 70, 225 contigs, out of which 6284 microsatellite markers were identified.Among which, 3838, 1817, 488, 132 and 9 were di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-and hexa-repeats, respectively.Primer modelling was successful for 4190 sequences.Similarly, 2, 14, 071 SNPs were identified using CLC bio v7.0.4 and utilizing Illumina reads obtained from Labeo bata.This study can be helpful in efficient use of carbohydrate in Labeo species for decreasing feed cost globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BiotechnologySame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207