MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763207658 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-129

131: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes for a Cohort of Children with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2014· article· en· W2763207658 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Clark, Lynn M. Breau, Helly Goez

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsGlenrose Rehabilitation Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlasgow Coma ScaleTraumatic brain injuryOccupational safety and healthCohortQuality of life (healthcare)Retrospective cohort studyPediatricsInjury preventionPoison controlEmergency medicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Multiattribute Health Status Classification System (MHSCS) is a parent/proxy administered tool including a series of health-specific domains that give levels of functioning between 1 (normal health) to 4 or 5 (most severe). Previous studies have used the MHSCS to document chronic health impairment and child morbidity (Gemke et al., 1995; 1996; Feeny et al., 1992; 1993; Saigal et al., 1994). There is a high inter-rater reliability exceeding 70% between caregivers and physiatrists with sensitivity and specificity from acute injury predictors at 75% and 70% (Robertson et al., 2001). The MHSCS is a useful parent-report surveillance tool to audit outcome after severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). To assess the post-injury health outcomes of young children sustaining a severe TBI using the MHSCS. This is a retrospective chart review of children who sustained severe TBI before 12 years of age & were followed in the Brain Injury program. Severe TBI was defined as Glasgow Coma Scale =<8/15. Ethics approval was granted. Demographic variables were collected and expressed as mean (± SD) (range). A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to compare scores on the MHSCS. A total of 18 children (10 male, eight female) mean age 6.84±3.4 years, (range 1.5 to 11.8 years) were reviewed at three years (n=8) or ≥5 years (n=10) post-injury. An independent t test indicated no significant difference between the Total scores at three and ≥5 years (P=0.23) (Chart 1). The overall difference across subscales was not significantly different (Chart 2). The Cognition Subscale scores increased significantly between three and ≥5 years (P=0.038) and the Emotional Subscale scores increased marginally (P=0.073). Outcomes of severe TBI persist beyond the acute recovery stages. Children experience significantly more difficulties with cognition and emotion at ≥5 years post injury than at three years. This may reflect emerging deficits as they face more complex material at school. Children also experience marginally more emotional difficulties at ≥5 years than at three years. This may reflect developmental maturity making them more aware of their TBI-related limitations. Although it was not significantly different, there was a trend towards lower scores for Mobility and Self-Care Subscales. The MHSCS was a useful parent-report surveillance tool to audit outcome after severe TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207