MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763245714 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e92b

162: The Big Score & Prediction of Mortality in Pediatric Trauma

2015· article· en· W2763245714 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne L. Davis, Paul W. Wales, Fathima Razik, Tahira Y Malik, Derek Stephens, Suzanne Schuh

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlasgow Coma ScaleRevised Trauma ScoreEmergency departmentReferralInjury Severity ScoreEmergency medicineMortality rateIntubationBlunt traumaRetrospective cohort studyPoison controlInternal medicineInjury preventionAnesthesiaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. The limitations of previous trauma mortality prediction scores include their complexity and lack of validation. In contrast, the BIG score is simple, easy to calculate, and incorporates key physiologic variables influencing trauma mortality: base-deficit, INR and Glascow Coma Scale- with encouraging validation results in Germany. However, the median age was higher than at most North American centers and other factors impacting mortality were not examined. We examined the association between in-hospital mortality and the BIG score measured on Emergency Department arrival in pediatric blunt trauma patients, adjusted for age, pre-hospital intubation, volume administration and referral hospital management. We also examined the association between the BIG score and mortality in patients requiring ICU care. A retrospective 2001–2012 trauma registry review of blunt trauma patients ≤17 years old. Charts were reviewed for in-hospital mortality, age, components of the BIG score on Emergency Department arrival, pre-hospital intubation, administration of a crystalloid bolus ≥20 mL/kg, local hospital referral and disposition. We found that 50/621 (8%) study patients died. Independent mortality predictors were the BIG score (OR 12, 95% CI 6–25), prior fluid bolus (OR 3, 95% CI 1.3–9) and prior intubation (OR 8, 95% CI 2–40). The area under the ROC curve was 0.95 (CI 0.93–0.98), with the optimal BIG cutoff of 16. With BIG <10, death rate was 1/382 (0.003, 95% CI 0.001–0.007), versus 23/209 (0.11, 95% CI 0.7–0.15) with BIG 11–25, and 26/30 (0.87, 95% CI 0.67–0.95) with BIG >25 (P<0.0001). In patients requiring the ICU, the BIG score remained predictive of mortality (OR 14.3, 95% CI 7.3–32, P<0.0001). The BIG score accurately predicts mortality in North American pediatric blunt trauma patients independent of age or pre-hospital interventions, identifies children with a high probability of survival (BIG ≤10) and those with highest potential of benefit from timely interventions (BIG 11–25). The BIG score is also associated with mortality in pediatric trauma patients requiring ICU care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→