MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763309142 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-58

59: The use of Scalp Veins for Insertion of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates

2014· article· en· W2763309142 on OpenAlexaff
AM Callejas, Horacio Osiovich, Joseph Ting

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripherally inserted central catheterScalpExtravasationSurgeryCatheterGestational ageVeinOcclusionPleural effusionAnesthesiaPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) via a peripheral vein has become routine for providing nutrition, fluids and medicaments to premature and ill newborns. PICCs are usually placed in the upper and lower extremities. To review our experience with scalp vein placed PICCs. A retrospective review of neonates who had PICC inserted from January 2010 to June 2013 was conducted. Data retrieved and analyzed were: birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), gender, site of insertion, duration in place and complications, including: central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), extravasation of fluid, mechanical (occlusion, phlebitis and leakage) and migration to non-central positions on follow-up. We identified 691 PICCs, with 64 inserted via scalp veins, 142 in the lower limb and 485 in the upper limbs. All but two neonates survived to discharge from hospital (97%). Median BW and GA were 2757 g (IQR 2308 g to 3153 g) and 37 weeks (IQR 35 to 39 weeks), respectively. Scalp PICCs were inserted via left temporal veins in 33 (52%) neonates and via right temporal veins in 31 (48%) neonates. There was a slight predominance of male gender 38 (60%). Median age at insertion was eight days (IQR five to 15 days). Median duration of placement was 12.5 days (IQR eight to 22 days). PICC tip location was central (tip at T3–T7 or within brachiocephalic vein or medial to clavicle) in 54 (84%). The incidence of CLABSI was 2.4 per 1000 catheter-days. Two infants (3%) had infiltration complications (one pleural effusion and one extravasation of TPN fluid into soft tissues) and two (3%) had occlusion. No leakage or phlebitis was reported. Among 19 neonates with chest x-ray done within two weeks after PICC insertion, three (16%) had migration of PICC tip to a non-central positions. PICCs with non-central tip position, at the time of insertion, were associated with shorter catheter days (13.5 vs. 7.0; P=0.032) and a trend towards higher mechanical or infiltration complications (20.0% vs. 3.7%; P=0.112) compared with those having a centrally placed PICC tip. PICC placement via scalp veins offers a safe and useful alternative for providing central venous access in neonates. Non-central tip position can be associated with a shorter duration of catheter use and higher rate of mechanical or infiltrative complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→