MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763311340 · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agx074.16

PO2-6EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE REHABILITATION PROGRAM IN 491 PATIENTS

2017· article· en· W2763311340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pascal Perney, Bertrand Nalpas, Régis Alarcon, Benjamin Vial, Laurie Robert, Jamie Rouch, Thomas Legrand, Valérie Ewert, Nicolas Simon, Hélène Donnadieu‐Rigole, Simon Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcohol and Alcoholism · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationCognitive rehabilitation therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitionPsychologyPhysical therapyGerontologyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) is proposed during prolonged institutional stays. However, the results of such a program remain poorly known. The aim of this study was to describe the primary results of a 6-week CR performed in an AUD treatment center. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively selected from our files AUD patients with following criteria: cognitive deficit assessed by the Montréal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at admission (i.e. MoCA < 26); evaluation at discharge; absence of neurological disease or a severe psychiatric trouble. The 6-week CR program is specifically adapted to the diagnosed abnormalities, and is performed by several professionals (neuropsychologist, occupational therapist, psychotherapist, physiotherapists). It is based on mental and physical (aerobics) training. All patients remained alcohol-free during their stay. Results: Among the 1497 patients hospitalized from November 2012 to January 2017, 491 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were 402 (69.4%) men and 89 women aged of 50.2 ± 9.7 years. The MoCA score was severely (≤21) and moderately (22–25) impaired in 44.6% and 55.4%, respectively. MoCA score increased from 21.27 ± 3.06 at admission to 24.37 ± 3.15 (p < 0.001) at discharge and 432 patients (84%) improved their cognitive score. A significant improvement was observed for all domains explored by the MoCA but specifically in visuospatial, attention and memory. For each MoCA sub-score the ratio between observed improvement (discharge –admission) to total potential improvement (max score –admission) was about 30 to 40% and was similar in the subgroups with severe and moderate cognitive impairment at admission. At discharge 20.1% of patients with severe and 50.6% with moderate cognitive impairment had a normal MoCA score, respectively. Finally, the mean cognitive improvement did not differ according to the duration of alcohol withdrawal before admission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcohol and AlcoholismSame topicAdvances in Oncology and RadiotherapyFrench-language works237,207