MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763319327 · doi:10.1353/wal.2006.0026

Crazy Woman Creek: Women Rewrite the American West ed. by Linda M. Hasselstrom, Gaydell Collier, Nancy Curtis

2006· article· en· W2763319327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beth Kalikoff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern American literature · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilogyAmerican westHistoryFriendshipIdentity (music)PoetryWishWhite (mutation)Art historySociologyArtLiteratureEthnologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

b o o k R e v ie w s 2 2 3 Overall, I felt some sections distracted from the personal writing evident here—there is a whole section on John Steinbeck, for example, which just seems too long, but at its best, this is a moving, witty book about identity and belonging, about the desire to find a “home” in a world of homelessness, to comprehend some sense of the West in the full knowledge that that quest is impossible, and, finally, it is a travelogue that understands how travel is so often about looking inward and backward rather than toward the next horizon. Crazy Woman Creek: Women Rewrite the American West. Edited by Linda M. Hasselstrom, Gaydell Collier, and Nancy Curtis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2004. 296 pages, $14.00. Reviewed by Beth Kalikoff University of Washington, Tacoma A collection of prose and poetry about women of the West, Crary Woman Creek represents the third book in a creative trilogy edited by the same trio. With Leaning into the Wind: Women Write from the Heart of the West (1997) and Women on the Wind: Women Write about Friendship in the Sagebrush West (2001), Crazy Woman Creek offers a mosaic of contemporary western women making their own history. It includes 158 works from 153 writers who hail from 21 states and 1 Canadian province, all “west of the Mississippi” (xxiii). The thoughtful introduction describes the collection’s themes and selection criteria, provides a history of the book’s evolution, and makes you wish you were up on the front porch with these three women and a hot mug of black coffee, watch­ ing the sun rise over the sagebrush and the Russian olive trees. The editors wisely determined the themes of the collection from the sub­ missions, and three ideas emerged. The first (“Women Driving Pickups”) rumi­ nates on “spontaneous” communities, those that come together without plan or forethought, like a pick-up basketball game. “Hallelujah and a Show of Hands” reflects the actions and implications of organized groups, “men and women who meet at set times for a specific purpose” (xxiii). Finally, “Cowgirl Up, Cupcakes” features prose and poetry about groups that choose us, where western women have sometimes found “possibilities we hadn’t considered” (xxiv). The section titles begin to suggest the energy and humor that pervade the collection. The selection criteria were “authenticity and quality of writing” (xxvii). Crazy Woman Creek is a good collection. Readers will, I believe, relish its geographical diversity: all readers will have walked somewhere in these essays, stories, and poems or somewhere like it. I personally have ridden my bike, like Daisy Lou of Virginia Bennett’s “Object of Affection,” around Twisp, Washington, stopping at the Farmer’s Market (May through October) near the Community Center, and I have a deeper understanding of that community when I return because of Bennett’s piece. The focus on community throughout the collection rises up like sweet bread, and here, too, readers feel a kinship, 2 2 4 W e s t e r n A m e r ic a n L it e r a t u r e S u m m e r 2 0 0 6 as women come to terms with their pasts, their towns, their children, their parents, their work, and each other. I especially love the sideways glances in the book as well as the dead-on stares, moments that convey the richness of experience alive throughout these pieces. While the editors talk about the “diversity” in the collection, that diversity tends to be generational and narrative rather than stylistic or attitudinal. This is not, perhaps, a collection for readers who want a robust exploration of, say, women who don’t learn and grow and share and care and come together for the greater good and come to love the West. Readers will be hard-pressed to find women who are as mean as snakes or who fly back to Newark vowing never to set foot in Pocatello again. But this faint caveat should not discourage the prodigious number of readers who will delight in this book. DeVoto’s West: History, Conservation, and the Public...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern American literatureSame topicAmerican Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207