MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763357194 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.51ab

107 Free Running Asthma Screening Test in Canadian Schoolchildren

2004· article· en· W2763357194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
AJ Poynter, AL Ciavarella

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaMedicineTest (biology)Physical therapyPediatricsBronchospasmInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was carried out to further develop the Free Running Asthma Screening Test (FRAST) as a practical efficient method to screen for asthma in Canadian schoolchildren in grades 4–12 (age 9–18). The FRAST was used to increase asthma awareness and identify new cases and to estimate the prevalence of asthma in Canadian children and adolescents in this age group. Agreement was obtained from school personnel and parents from 3 schools in BC and 3 schools in Ontario. The authors attended regular Physical Education (PE) classses to carry out the FRAST and an asthma teaching program. Instruction in the use of individual Peak Flow (PF) meter was done, the students practised the PF maneuver, then recorded 3 baseline PF measures. They then did a 7-minute outdoor run, followed by measuring and recording 3 PF's at each of 0, 5, 10 and 15 minutes post-run. During the time intervals between the PF measurements the students filled out an asthma screening questionnaire and recorded individual narrative comments about their symptoms with running. To score the results, the highest PF of each of the 3 PF's at each time was used and the percent change from baseline calculated. A drop of at least 15% from baseline PF to any of the post-run PF's indicated exercise-induced bronchospasm. Symptom scoring, history of previously diagnosed asthma and past or current use of asthma medications was elicited from the questionnaire and narratives. Of 1039 students present in PE classes on the FRAST days 1003 participated. The prevalence of a previous diagnosis of asthma, based on the questionnaire was 17.4% (n=101) in BC schools and 23.9% (n=101) in Ontario schools. The prevalence of asthma determined by FRAST was 13.8 (n=80) in BC and 24.6 (n=104) in Ontario. This yields an overall prevalence of asthma of 26.1% in the BC schools and 38.1% in the Ontario schools. Reported treatment rates of the total number of students with previously diagnosed or found to have asthma by the FRAST were only 10.6% in BC and 9.2% in Ontario. We conclude: mass asthma screening as part of the PE class is accurate and feasible in Canadian students in grades 4–12. Use of the FRAST as a provocation method, along with a questionnaire increases the number of cases found compared to just using passive questionnaires. There is a large treatment gap for this most common chronic disease of childhood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→