MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763629027 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-2

2: Impact of Admission Temperature on Mortality and Major Morbidities in Very Preterm Infants

2014· article· en· W2763629027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying Lyu, PS Shah, Ye Xy, Akhil Deshpandey, M Dunn, Seung‐Koo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinopathy of prematurityMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaNecrotizing enterocolitisGestational agePeriventricular leukomalaciaPediatricsIntensive careIntraventricular hemorrhageUnivariate analysisBirth weightPregnancyMultivariate analysisIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There have been limited investigations of the influence of admission body temperature on neonatal outcomes. Optimal ranges of admission temperature associated with mortality and morbidity are still unclear. To examine the impact of admission temperature on adverse neonatal outcomes and to identify optimal ranges of temperature in very preterm infants. Inborn neonates with gestational age <33 weeks admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in Canadian Neonatal Network between 2010 and 2012 were included. Neonates with major congenital anomalies were excluded. The admission temperature measured within 5 h after admission to NICU was classified into nine groups starting from <34.5°C to ≥38°C with 0.5°C increment. The composite outcome was defined as mortality or any major morbidity including bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC), nosocomial infection(NI), severe intraventricular haemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia and severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The relationship between admission temperature and composite outcome and individual components of composite outcome identified in univariate analyses were further examined and used to determine the optimal temperature range using multivariable analyses. Of all 9833 neonates, 12%, 24%, 38%, 19%, 5%, and 2% of neonates had admission temperature <36°C, 36°C to 36.4°C, 36.5°C to 36.9°C, 37°C to 37.4°C, 37.5°C to 37.9°C, ≥38°C respectively. After adjustment for related maternal and infants characteristics, admission temperature was inversely related to mortality (19.5% increase per 0.5°C decrease) and a significant ‘U’ shaped relationship between admission temperature and composite outcome, NEC, ROP, BPD, and NI was observed, respectively .The rates of composite outcome, NEC, ROP, BPD, NI were lowest when the admission temperature was between 36.5°C and 37.4°C. Admission temperature in very preterm infants is associated with mortality and major morbidities. The optimal admission temperature in preterm infants ranged between 36.5°C and 37.4°C. This is the first outcome-based and population-based study in our knowledge with findings of optimal range of temperatures in very preterm infants consistent with WHO's recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→