MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763686133 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e81

129: Gastric Flora in Gastrostomy Fed Children with Neurological Impairment on Acid Suppression Medication

2015· article· en· W2763686133 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bradley De Souza, Eyal Cohen, Yaron Avitzur, Susan E. Richardson, Sanjay Mahant, Adam Rapoport

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOmeprazoleInternal medicineAspiration pneumoniaGastroenterologyAmbulatoryCerebral palsyGastric acidMechanical ventilationPneumoniaStomachParenteral nutritionPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is the most common cause of hospitalization and death in children with neurologic impairment (CNI). Yet, very little is known about the conditions that contribute to AP in CNI or how it should be treated. Furthermore, it is unclear if current routine interventions in CNI, including G-tubes and acid suppression medication (ASM), have altered previously held assumptions about the microbiological causes of AP in these children. (1) To describe the type, concentration and susceptibility profile of bacteria found in gastric aspirates of CNI with G-tubes; (2) to compare gastric flora of CNI in ambulatory settings to those admitted to hospital with AP; and (3) to explore predictors of bacterial colonization of the stomach. We recruited CNI who were G-tube fed and on regular ASM. Outpatients were recruited from routine clinic visits at a children's hospital in Canada; inpatients were admitted with a clinical diagnosis of AP. Excluded were immunocompromised patients and those on 24/7 home ventilation. Gastric aspirates were collected from the G-tube and sent for pH and microbial testing. All pathogenic bacteria were tested for antibiotic sensitivity. 42 patients (21 inpatients, 21 outpatients) have been recruited to date. Omeprazole was the most common ASM (N=38). Among inpatients, 50% had an underlying genetic syndrome, mean pH of gastric sample was 5.6±2.2 and mean bacterial growth was 2.17×108 CFU/mL. Among outpatients, 65% had an underlying diagnosis of cerebral palsy, mean gastric pH was 5.4±1.8 and mean bacterial growth was 2.85×108 CFU/mL. All inpatient and outpatient samples collected with pH2 (n=38) showed growth, with Streptococcus viridans (22.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.9%) being the most common organisms grown. There was no significant difference in the types of organisms found in gastric samples of inpatients vs. outpatients. Antibiotic sensitivity rates assessed in pathogenic bacteria were 96.6%, 96.6%, 93.5% for ciprofloxacin, gentamycin and tobramycin, respectively. Traditionally considered a sterile environment, a variety of microorganisms, many of which are common flora of the oropharyngeal tract, are being found in gastric aspirates of study participants. This may be related to increases in gastric pH secondary to ASM. Further studies will be needed to correlate organisms grown in gastric aspirates of CNIs on ASM to those causing APs as this may have implications for the optimal treatment of APs in this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→