Inflammatory proteins in nasal lavage of workers exposed to occupational agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) agents have been recognized as causes of occupational rhinitis (OR). Immunological mechanisms underlying OR differ according to the type of exposure. While HMW agents act mainly through IgE-mediated mechanisms, LMW agents appear to act through both immunological and non-immunological mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify potential differences in the upper airways inflammatory response after exposure to LMW and HMW agents by specific inhalation challenge test (SIC). METHODS: Nasal lavage (NL) samples from 20 subjects who were exposed to HMW (n = 10, Group I) and LMW (n = 10, Group II) at their workplaces were collected after SIC with control and specific occupational agents. These samples were analysed for 47 inflammatory markers using multiplex bead technology. RESULTS: After exposure to specific agent, Group I exhibited higher concentrations of the following proteins compared to Group II: fibrinogen (median (interquartile range) Group I: 0.09 (0.00) μg/mL, Group II: 0.04 (0.05) μg/mL, P = .05); haptoglobin (Group I: 0.86 (0.01) μg/mL, Group II: 0.14 (0.20) μg/mL, P = .02); vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (Group I: 0.34 (0.67) ng/mL, Group II: 0.11 (0.11) ng/mL, P = .01); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Group I: 157.0 (154.0) pg/mL, Group II: 98.0 (20.25) pg/mL, P = .01); and vitamin D (VDBP) (Group I: 0.06 (0.13) μg/mL, Group II: 0.03 (0.03) μg/mL, P = .04). No statistically significant differences in proteins profiles were observed between the groups after exposure to control agent. Also, subjects exposed to HMW agents showed a significant increase in NL levels of C-reactive protein compared to control-day exposure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exposure to HMW and LMW agents by SIC induced a differential nasal airway response including acute-phase reactants proteins (fibrinogen, haptoglobin and CRP), cell adhesion molecules (VCAM-1), endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and VDBP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".