MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763792610 · doi:10.2118/187284-ms

A Novel Bayesian Optimization Framework for Computationally Expensive Optimization Problem in Tight Oil Reservoirs

2017· article· en· W2763792610 on OpenAlex
Shuhua Wang, Shengnan Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian optimizationMathematical optimizationParticle swarm optimizationComputer scienceDifferential evolutionMeta-optimizationDirectional drillingTight oilOptimization problemGlobal optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsDrillingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multi-well pad has been considered as the most efficient horizontal-well drilling technique in unconventional reservoir development since it not only greatly maximizes the oil production, but also significantly reduces environmental impact and operation costs by drilling group of wells on a single pad. To optimize both hydraulic fracture parameters of each well and well placement simultaneously is still largely unexplored and remains to be a challenging task. Conventional optimization techniques, such as genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and differential evolution algorithm are inadequate to optimize production performance in the multi-well pad, because it may take hours to days to run a single reservoir simulation, leading to an unaffordable computational cost for the optimization processes. To speed up the search process of global optimization in reservoir simulations, a novel optimization framework for computationally expensive simulations is developed based on Bayesian optimization algorithm. The newly developed optimization algorithm constructs a probabilistic model for the objective function and then exploits this model to make decisions about where in search space to next evaluate the function. In this study, Gaussian Process (GP) is utilized to construct the prior distribution over the objective function. Then, the posterior over functions is obtained based on the prior distribution and evaluations of objective functions. Finally, acquisition function is developed through maximizing the expected improvement over the current best from the posterior, allowing us to determine the next point to evaluate in search space. It is shown that GP Bayesian optimization framework can successfully optimize the hydraulic fracture parameters and horizontal well placement simultaneously in tight oil reservoirs. 19 parameters involve well spacing, well length, fracture spacing, fracture half-length, and fracture conductivity in a four-well pad were optimized and a high net present value (NPV) was achieved. The oil recovery and NPV of the optimum scenario derived through the Bayesian optimization technique are increased by 36.0% and 55.7% respectively in comparison with a field reference case. The proposed Bayesian optimization framework is found to be a promising and efficient optimization strategy, which takes full advantage of the information available from previous evaluations of objective function, in handling the computationally expensive optimization problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it