MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763794905 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e95

169: Knowledge of Childhood Development and Parenting Confidence of Mothers with Young Children Who Have Special Health Care Needs

2015· article· en· W2763794905 on OpenAlexaff
K MacLellan, Ben Gibbard, AP Botey, Suzanne Tough

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLikert scaleConfidence intervalPsychological interventionEarly childhoodPediatricsDevelopmental psychologyNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Young children with special health care needs (SHCN) have unique developmental challenges and require intensive parenting to reach their potential. Mothers are often the primary caregiver and interventions have aimed at increasing their knowledge of early childhood development. Previous research in high-risk populations has found that the combination of high maternal knowledge of childhood development combined with high maternal confidence correlates with competent parenting. Low knowledge combined with high confidence is felt to be more detrimental than low knowledge and low confidence. To compare the knowledge and confidence levels of mothers with young children (<=6 years) who have SHCN to mothers with young children who do not have SHCN. A telephone survey of 1452 randomly selected adults included questions regarding knowledge of early childhood development and parenting confidence. A total of 320 respondents were mothers of children 6 years of age or younger; 46 had at least one child with a SHCN and 274 did not have a child with a SHCN. High maternal knowledge was defined as answering correctly at least 50% of the questions in at least two of four developmental domains (physical, cognitive, emotional and social). High confidence were those who selected “strongly agree” at the top end of a 7-point Likert scale. Between-group comparisons were analyzed using a t-test for binomial proportions (P<0.05). About 70% of mothers in each group were found to have low knowledge. Mothers of children with SHCN were more likely to indicate high parenting confidence (54%) than mothers of children without SHCN (33%). Based on knowledge and confidence level mothers were assigned to one of four groups. A significantly greater proportion of mothers of children with SHCN had low knowledge/high confidence than mothers of children without SHCN (P=0.03). A greater proportion of mothers of young children with SHCN fall into the category of low knowledge and high confidence. This combination may have a negative effect on parenting success. Further research is required to determine why this combination is more prevalent among mothers of children with SHCN, and how future interventions might more effectively support parents of children with SHCN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicChild and Adolescent Health→French-language works237,207→