MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Initial experience of radium-223 treatment for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer in community setting.

2014· article· en· W2763906206 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Pieczonka, Marc Bienz, Vladimira Mouravieva, David Albala, Vladimir Mouraviev, Neil Mariados

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerCohortIncidence (geometry)CancerMetastasisBone painBone metastasisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e16106 Background: The many advantages associated with Ra-223 cytotoxic mechanism of action and excretion makes it a stronger, less myelotoxic and nephrotoxic option than its counterparts (Sm153 and Sr89). We report the shortterm pain evolution, side effects and hematologic profile of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing Ra-223 treatment. Methods: Clinical data from 19 mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 was collected from a large multi-disciplinary group. In accordance with the FDA’s recommended dosage, Ra-223’s monthly injections were composed of 1 dose of 50 kBq/kg, for 6 months. Up to the third injection, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ladder for cancer pain was assessed and the pain pattern evaluated and classified in groups: no or minimal pain relief, worsening and improvement of pain. Also, short-term incidence of side effects was reported together with the hematologic parameters at each injection. Data is expressed as a median (range). Results: This cohort was composed of 19 Caucasian men aged 74 (53-85) years old, and all suffered bone metastasis. At baseline, 13.3% graded the pain at 1 according to the WHO pain score. At the first follow-up, 27 (19-35) days after the first injection, 21.5% (2/19) noticed pain relief, and 37.5% had a WHO score of 1. 22 (21-22) days after the second injection, 44.4% (8/18) had reduced pain symptoms, and 37.5% had a WHO score of 1. At the third follow-up, 35 (22-35) days after the third injection, 50% (6/12) had pain relief, and 50% had a WHO score of 1. Also, for 10.5% (n=2) of our cohort, pain symptoms worsened while 21% (n=4) reached total pain remission by the third injection. Increased bowl movement frequency was observed in 10.5% of our cohort, diarrhea in 31.6%, constipation in 5.3%, nausea in 26.3%, vomiting in 5.3%, bone pain flair response in 26.3% and lower limb edema in 10.5%. Conclusions: Our short-term results demonstrated promising bone-pain relief effect of Ra-223 in 50% of our patients even after a maximum of only three injections. Encountered side effects were mild including mostly gastro-intestinal symptoms, but a 21.3% platelet reduction was observed by the third injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.569
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→