MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764068991 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e64b

84: Extended Interval Gentamicin Dosing in Preterm Neonates Less Than 35 Weeks Corrected Gestational Age

2015· article· en· W2764068991 on OpenAlexaff
Jarrid W R McKitrick, Brad Bewick, Robert E. Ariano, Michael Narvey, Sheryl Zelenitsky, Geert t’Jong

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacokineticsGentamicinMedicineGestational ageDosingVolume of distributionPopulationElimination rate constantLoading doseNeonatal sepsisBirth weightSepsisAntibioticsAnesthesiaPregnancyInternal medicineChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extended interval gentamicin dosing in neonates <35 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA) has been shown to achieve optimal serum peak concentrations compared to traditional once daily doses. However recommendations on exact dose and frequency vary. After a literature review, a dose of 5 mg/kg/dose every 48 hours was implemented at our institutions. To characterize concentration-time profiles achieved with a gentamicin dose of 5 mg/kg every 48 hours in neonates <35 weeks CGA. To identify gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates <35 weeks CGA: half-life (t1/2), clearance, and volume of distribution (V1). Pharmacokinetics were prospectively analyzed after implementation of 5 mg/kg gentamicin as a single empiric dose for sepsis in neonates <35 weeks CGA (n=54). Serum samples were drawn at approximately 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h post dose. Target serum concentrations were 6–12 mg/L and 0.5–2 mg/L at 1 h and 48 h, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on available samples to determine if birth weight, gender, gestational age at birth, CGA, or postnatal age (PNA) affect gentamicin clearance, t1/2, V1, or serum levels. A one-compartment model best represented the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin for our population. Average pharmacokinetic parameters were: clearance 42±10 mL/kg/h, V1 0.578±0.087 L/kg, and t1/2 9.98±1.84 h. In all treatment courses when at least two serum levels were drawn (n=44), mean levels extrapolated to 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h were 8.24±1 mg/L, 1.6±0.48 mg/L, and 0.31±0.16 mg/L respectively. Neonates <14 days PNA had significantly higher gentamicin levels at 24 h (1.7±0.3 mg/L vs. 1.1±0.7 mg/L, P=0.002) and at 48 h post dose (0.34±0.14 mg/L vs. 0.2±0.2 mg/L, P=0.03). Clearance was significantly lower in neonates <14 days PNA (mean 38±5 mL/kg/h vs. 55±18 mL/kg/h, P=0.01) but was not affected by other covariates. V1 was not influenced by any covariates. A gentamicin dose of 5 mg/kg in neonates <35 weeks CGA and <14 days PNA results in post serum levels of 6–12 mg/L. Gentamicin clearance in neonates <35 weeks CGA was not affected by gestational age at birth, CGA, gender, or birth weight but increased as PNA increased suggesting the need to dose gentamicin more frequently than every 48 hours in neonates 14 days PNA. The risk of medication error may be reduced from this simplified approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207