MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2764112420 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-84

86: Apnea of Prematurity: Prolonged Cardiorespiratory Monitoring for Late Preterms Who Presented Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2014· article· en· W2764112420 on OpenAlexaff
François Olivier, M Turcot, Sophie Nadeau, Georges Caouette

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApnea of prematurityCardiorespiratory fitnessRespiratory distressApneaPediatricsNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatal respiratory distress syndromeMechanical ventilationPopulationGestational ageAnesthesiaInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatricians are daily confronted with monitoring and safe discharge issues concerning late preterm infants (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA)) considering the risk of apnea of prematurity (AOP). Late preterms are 15 times more at risk of AOP when compared with term newborns. Since AOP peak arises beyond the very first days of life, timing and duration of monitoring arouse debate. Current recommandations regarding late preterms hospital discharge do not systematically mandate cardiorespiratory monitoring. The objective of this study was to describe a late preterms population affected by Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in order to documented AOP prevalence during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization. A descriptive and retrospective study including late preterms with RDS diagnosis, admitted to a tertiary NICU, from January 2009 to December 2011, was conducted. Eighty five late preterms with RDS diagnosis were included and underwent cardiorespiratory monitoring. There was an increase in AOP prevalence with younger PMA; 34.8%, 70.4% and 88.6% for 36, 35 and 34 weeks PMA, respectively (P<0.0001). Caffeine treatment was used in 8.7%, 11.1% and 25,7% of 36, 35 and 34 weeks PMA late preterms, respectively. Late preterms with AOP diagnosis, whether treated or not with caffeine had a longer hospitalization (10.40 vs. 8.18 days, P=0.0019, without caffeine) (13.8 vs. 9.69 days, P=0.047, with caffeine). Patients treated with caffeine presented an extended duration of ventilatory support (5.05 vs. 4.18 days, P=0.027). The unexpected discovery of AOP high prevalence and its association with caffeine treatment in monitored late preterms admitted for RDS highlights that current recommendations about safe discharge in late preterms are not optimal when addressing this specific population. RDS occurrence in near term infants reflects their immaturity and consequently, their susceptibility to AOP. Therefore, late preterms should be considered for an extended period of monitoring after RDS resolution. Further studies are necessary to determine if recommandations should be made requiring a normal respirogram record or a seven-day period without apnea before safe discharge in late preterms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→