MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764160069 · doi:10.1111/ddi.12662

Niche centrality and human influence predict rangewide variation in population abundance of a widespread mammal: The collared peccary (<i>Pecari tajacu</i>)

2017· article· en· W2764160069 on OpenAlexfundno aff
P. Guadalupe Martínez-Gutiérrez, Enrique Martínez‐Meyer, Francisço Palomares, Néstor Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity and Distributions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)PopulationEcologyNicheRelative species abundanceEnvironmental niche modellingBiologyGeographyEcological nicheDemographyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim (1) To evaluate whether geographic variation in population abundance of a widespread mammal ( Pecari tajacu ) is related to its location with respect to the centroid of its ecological niche or to the centroid of its geographic range. (2) To assess whether the abundance–niche centrality relationship defines the maximum expected abundance at any location, rather than the realized abundance. (3) To test whether including human impacts improves the abundance–niche centrality relationship, and therefore the prediction of geographic variation in population abundance. Location The Americas. Methods We modelled the ecological niche of the species using occurrence and environmental data and created spatial models of distance to the niche centroid ( DNC ) and to the geographic centroid ( DGC ). We tested the relationships between population abundance and DNC and between abundance and DGC . We evaluated whether the rate of change in the abundance– DNC relationship was steeper near the upper boundary of quantile regressions. We tested whether the human influence index ( HII ) contributed to improve niche‐based predictions of population abundance. Finally, we generated broad‐scale predictions of collared peccary population abundances. Results We found a negative relationship between abundance and DNC and a non‐significant relationship between abundance and DGC . The abundance– DNC relationship was wedge‐shaped, steeper in the upper quantile boundary than in the median. HII also had a negative effect on abundance. The model including DNC and HII was best supported for predicting the median abundance, while DNC alone was the best to predict the upper boundary of population abundances. Main conclusions Population abundances are associated with the structure of the ecological niche, especially the maximum abundance expected in an area. Thus, the DNC approach can be useful in obtaining a spatial approximation of potential abundance patterns at biogeographic extents. To achieve a better prediction of realized abundances, it is critical to consider the human influence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversity and DistributionsSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207