Growth and yield of rice as influenced by different planting techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Uttar Dinajpur Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Chopra, Uttar Dinapur, West Bengal, India to study the effect of different planting techniques on growth and yield of rice (cv. Koushalya). The results obtained for two years on tillering pattern depicted that maximum tiller number (715.7 m-2) was obtained in system of rice intensification (SRI) method at 70 days after sowing (DAS). Rice crop grown with SRI technique matures at least 4–7 days earlier than other planting methods. SRI technique produced maximum plant height (152.9 cm), moderate number of chaffy grains per panicle (25.9), maximum number of in-effective tillers (43.2 m-2), whereas, double planting technique produced least plant height (133.1 cm) as well as least number of ineffective tillers (16.0 m-2). SRI technique also out yielded all other treatments with respect to yield components, grain yield (5.6 t ha-1) and straw yield (7.6 t ha-1). However, double transplanting method recorded highest harvest Index (HI), while, it was least with SRI method. Considering all the factors, SRI method proved to be the best method as compared to other transplanting methods under study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".