MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2764260590 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.tmp70

Abstract TMP70: Assessment of Home Time Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in Medicare Beneficiaries

2016· article· en· W2764260590 on OpenAlexaff
Gregg C. Fonarow, Li Liang, Laine Thomas, Ying Xian, Jeffrey L. Saver, Eric E. Smith, Lee H. Schwamm, Eric D. Peterson, Adrian F. Hernandez, Pamela W. Duncan, Emily C. O’Brien, Cheryl Bushnell, Janet Prvu Bettger

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleIschemic strokeNursing homesEmergency medicinePhysical therapyPediatricsInternal medicineIschemiaNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke survivors have identified “home-time” (days spent at home alive and outside of a hospital) as a meaningful outcome. However, home-time has not been well studied as an outcome of interest outside of clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate home-time as a patient-centered outcome in Medicare beneficiaries with ischemic stroke in comparison with modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days and 1 year post event. Methods: Patients ≥65 years old enrolled in GWTG-Stroke and AVAIL (Adherence eValuation After Ischemic Stroke Longitudinal) registry were linked to Medicare claims to ascertain home-time, defined as time spent alive and out of a hospital or skilled nursing facility, at 90 days and 1 year after admission for ischemic stroke. The correlation of home-time with mRS at 90 days and 1 year from admission were evaluated graphically and by Pearson correlation coefficients. In addition, to assess the level of agreement between measures, the c-index of 90 day and 1 year home-time predicting 90 day and 1 year mRS 0-2 were determined. Results: There were 815 ischemic stroke patients (age median 76 years [IQR 70-82], 46% female, NIHSS median 4 [IQR 2-7]) from 88 participating hospitals. The 90 day and 1 year median home-times were 79 days (IQR 52-86) and 349 days (IQR 303-360). The 90 day and 1 year median mRS were 2 (IQR 1-4) and 2 (IQR 1-4). The Pearson correlation coefficient between 90 day mRS and home-time within 90 days was -0.731 (p-value<.0001) (Figure). The c-index of 90 days home-time predicting 90 day mRS 0-2 was 0.837. The Pearson correlation coefficient between 1 year mRS and home-time within 1 year was -0.713 (p-value<.0001). The c-index of 1 year home-time predicting 12 month mRS 0-2 was 0.828. Conclusions: In a population of older ischemic stroke patients, home-time was correlated with and showed a strong level of agreement with mRS at 90 days and 1 year. Home-time may be able to serve as a novel, patient-centered, outcome measure for hospital/transitional stroke care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→