MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764282311 · doi:10.1130/g39265.1

A magma-poor rift model for the Cordilleran margin of western North America

2017· article· en· W2764282311 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luke P. Beranek

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyRiftBreakupMagmatismPaleontologyLithospherePassive marginCrustSeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cordilleran margin of western North America has an uncertain rift evolution that includes >300 m.y. of lithospheric extension, breakup, and syn- to post-breakup magmatism. Here I use the Newfoundland-Iberia rift system as a modern analogue to evaluate Cordilleran margin development and propose a magma-poor rift model for western North America. After polyphase Tonian–Ediacaran rifting, early Cambrian breakup resulted in a base-level fall and generation of the basal Sauk I megasequence boundary. A lower to middle Cambrian breakup succession developed over this lithospheric breakup surface and from bottom to top consists of lowstand, transgressive, and highstand systems tract deposits. Lower Cambrian volcanic strata are recognized in proximal breakup successions and predicted to be more voluminous in outboard regions with hyperextended crust and exhumed mantle. Off-axis, post-breakup volcanic strata were generated during the release of in-plane tensile stresses and focusing of extension toward the nascent plate boundary. These findings suggest that ancient magma-poor rift assemblages, including those affected by later convergent tectonism, can preserve their original stratigraphic attributes and be successfully identified in the geological record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207