Bibliographic record
Abstract
Live attenuated varicella vaccine is available in Canada. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended immunization of healthy susceptible individuals after one year of age. This was endorsed by a National Varicella Consensus Conference, provided that 90% coverage could be ensured. So far only Prince Edward Island has begun universal childhood immunization. Barriers to achieving high childhood vaccine coverage include: the perception that chickenpox is mild in children but severe in both adults and immunocompromised; concern that vaccine field effectiveness will be much lower than observed in pre-licensure efficacy trials; fear that waning immunity may increase adult cases and the associated disease burden; and uncertainty regarding long term morbidity due to vaccine strain reactivation. In fact, chickenpox is usually an uncomplicated illness in otherwise healthy individuals of all ages. Further, with varicella zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) prophylaxis and acyclovir treatment soon after rash onset, the course in immunocompromised individuals is also usually benign. However, on a population basis, otherwise healthy children with no identifiable risk factors account for 80% to 90% of all chickenpox-associated hospital admissions and 40% to 60% of case fatalities. A more accurate assessment of the relative merits of varicella immunization should contrast the current natural history of disease (90% to 95% infected symptomatically by age 15 years, 15% lifetime risk of a moderate to severe reactivation episode) with the demonstrated vaccine effectiveness of 70% to 86% against any chickenpox, 95% to 100% against moderate to severe illness and significant reduction of frequency and severity of reactivation illness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".