MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764857789 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386295

Application of Modal Sensitivity for Power System Harmonic Resonance Analysis

2007· article· en· W2764857789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmittanceResonance (particle physics)Sensitivity (control systems)Admittance parametersEigenvalues and eigenvectorsHarmonicHarmonic analysisModal analysisModalMode (computer interface)Computer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)SingularityTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsElectronic engineeringPhysicsMathematical analysisAcousticsEngineeringElectrical impedanceVibrationQuantum mechanicsVoltageMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harmonic resonance is closely related to the singularity of a network admittance matrix. The smallest eigenvalue of the matrix defines the mode of harmonic resonance. This paper applies this eigenvalue theory and proposes a method to determine which network components have significant contributions to a harmonic resonance phenomenon. The basic idea is to calculate the sensitivities of a resonance mode to the parameters of network components. The sensitivity results are then ranked to quantify the impact of each component. In this paper, the eigen-sensitivity theory as applied to harmonic resonance mode analysis is presented. Case studies are used to verify the theory. A practical example is given to illustrate the application of the proposed method. In addition, this paper further conducts extensive comparative analysis on three types of network oriented modal analysis techniques. The results have clarified the similarities and differences among the techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it