MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765086430 · doi:10.1094/pdis-09-17-1455-fe

Advances in Diagnostics of Downy Mildews: Lessons Learned from Other Oomycetes and Future Challenges

2017· review· en· W2765086430 on OpenAlexaff
Sharifa G. Crandall, Alamgir Rahman, L. M. Quesada-Ocampo, Frank N. Martin, Guillaume J. Bilodeau, Timothy D. Miles

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
FundersAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServicePickle Packers InternationalU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsDowny mildewBiologyOutbreakCropBiotechnologyAgronomyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Downy mildews are plant pathogens that damage crop quality and yield worldwide. Among the most severe and notorious crop epidemics of downy mildew occurred on grapes in the mid-1880s, which almost destroyed the wine industry in France. Since then, there have been multiple outbreaks on sorghum and millet in Africa, tobacco in Europe, and recent widespread epidemics on lettuce, basil, cucurbits, and spinach throughout North America. In the mid-1970s, loss of corn to downy mildew in the Philippines was estimated at US$23 million. Today, crops that are susceptible to downy mildews are worth at least $7.5 billion of the United States' economy. Although downy mildews cause devastating economic losses in the United States and globally, this pathogen group remains understudied because they are difficult to culture and accurately identify. Early detection of downy mildews in the environment is critical to establish pathogen presence and identity, determine fungicide resistance, and understand how pathogen populations disperse. Knowing when and where pathogens emerge is also important for identifying critical control points to restrict movement and to contain populations. Reducing the spread of pathogens also decreases the likelihood of sexual recombination events and discourages the emergence of novel virulent strains. A major challenge in detecting downy mildews is that they are obligate pathogens and thus cannot be cultured in artificial media to identify and maintain specimens. However, advances in molecular detection techniques hold promise for rapid and in some cases, relatively inexpensive diagnosis. In this article, we discuss recent advances in diagnostic tools that can be used to detect downy mildews. First, we briefly describe downy mildew taxonomy and genetic loci used for detection. Next, we review issues encountered when identifying loci and compare various traditional and novel platforms for diagnostics. We discuss diagnosis of downy mildew traits and issues to consider when detecting this group of organisms in different environments. We conclude with challenges and future directions for successful downy mildew detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207