Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The marriage–health association has been investigated extensively among proximal couples (i.e., those living geographically near each other). On average, married men trend toward better health and relationship outcomes from their marital status compared to married women. This may be attributed to gender role socialization that encourages women to adopt a caretaking role toward their partners. Current literature has not addressed whether there are differential relationship or health outcomes by gender within long-distance relationship (LDR). The present study investigated LDR relationship and health indices by gender. Using Qualtrics and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, married LDR participants ( n = 93, 21 years or older, English speakers) completed an online survey. Relationship measures assessed satisfaction, maintenance, stress, and sex. Health variables included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29, Perceived Stress Scale, and surveys examining substance use, diet, and exercise. t Tests were used to measure group differences by gender. Women in LDR reported few relationship and health benefits relative to men in LDR. Men reported higher levels of relational distress and increased smoking, yet better physical functioning. Men also trended toward higher levels of relational maintenance and healthier eating as a function of partner presence. This study provides counterevidence for the gender role socialization model within the LDR framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it