MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765188911 · doi:10.1109/oceanse.2017.8084950

Channel model for wideband time-varying underwater acoustic systems

2017· article· en· W2765188911 on OpenAlexafffund
Habib Mirhedayati Roudsari, Jean‐François Bousquet, Graham McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsUnderwaterWidebandUnderwater acoustic communicationChannel (broadcasting)AcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsGeologyElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a wideband underwater acoustic (UWA) channel simulator is developed based on the geometry of the system deployment and by considering the statistics of the random amplitude variation of the channel. This channel simulator is capable of modeling any relative motion between the transmitter and receiver. The delays of multipath arrivals are calculated based on the geometrical and physical parameters of the deployment. The time-varying fractional delay line (TVFDL) is utilized as a flexible and low-complexity software tool to model time-scaling observed on individual paths. The fading characteristics of the channel which is extracted from the measurements is utilized to model the time-varying amplitudes of paths. Also, an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system is tested throughout a sea trial. The geometrical and statistical parameters of the sea trial are utilized to test the OFDM system using the proposed channel simulator. The bit error rate (BER) of the system is calculated in both measurements and simulations and it will be shown that the assessment of the communication performance realized using simulations is very close to that of the measured performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCEANS 2017 - AberdeenSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207