Clinical applications of <scp>QT</scp>/<scp>RR</scp> hysteresis assessment: A systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: QT/RR hysteresis (QT-hys) is an index of the time accommodation of ventricular repolarization to heart rate changes. This report comprehensively reviews studies addressing QT-hys as a biomarker of medical conditions. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a recent systematic review pertaining to methods of assessment of QT-hys. Articles included in the former review were filtered in order to select original articles investigating the association of QT-hys with medical conditions in humans. RESULTS: Nineteen articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Given the heterogeneity of the methods and investigated conditions, no pooled analysis of data could be implemented. QT-hys was mostly studied as a risk marker of severe arrhythmias, as a predictor of the long QT syndrome (LQTS) phenotypes and genotypes and as a marker of exercise-induced ischemia. An increased QT-hys appears to be implicated in arrhythmogenesis, although the evidence in this regard relies on few human studies. An augmented QT-hys was reported in the LQTS, predominantly in the LQT2 genotype, but conflicting results were obtained between studies using different methods of assessment. In addition, QT-hys appears to be a useful marker of stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: QT-hys evaluation has potential clinical utility in at least some clinical conditions. Further studies of the clinical validity of QT-hys assessment are warranted, particularly condition specific studies based on QT-hys evaluation methods that provide separate estimates of QT-hys and QT/RR dependency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".