MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765312387 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00730

Corrigendum: Candidate Gene Resequencing in a Large Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Associated Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Cohort: SMAD6 as an Important Contributor

2017· erratum· en· W2765312387 on OpenAlexaff
Elisabeth Gillis, Ajay Kumar, Ilse Luyckx, Christoph Preuß, Elyssa Cannaerts, Gerarda van de Beek, Björn Wieschendorf, Maaike Alaerts, Nikhita Bolar, Geert Vandeweyer, Josephina Meester, Florian Wünnemann, Russell A. Gould, Rustam Zhurayev, Zerbino Dd, Salah A. Mohamed, Seema Mital, Luc Mertens, Hanna M. Björck, Anders Franco‐Cereceda, Andrew S. McCallion, Lut Van Laer, Judith M.A. Verhagen, Ingrid M.B.H. van de Laar, Marja W. Wessels, Emmanuel Messas, Guillaume Goudot, Michaela Němčíková, Alice Krebsová, Marlies Kempers, Simone Salemink, Toon Duijnhouwer, Xavier Jeunemaı̂tre, Juliette Albuisson, Per Eriksson, Grégor Andelfinger, Harry C. Dietz, Aline Verstraeten, Bart Loeys

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicuspid aortic valveThoracic aortic aneurysmCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineAortic aneurysmCohortAneurysmCandidate geneAortic valveGeneAortaSurgeryGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the original article, we noted two mutation annotation errors. The correction of these two mistakes does not change the scientific conclusions in any way. The authors apologize for these nomenclature errors. Please find below the corrected annotations of those two mutations: (1) The correct RNA and protein annotations of the SMAD6 variant in P99 are c.455_461del and p.Pro152Profs*27, and not c.454_461del and p.Gly166Valfs*23. (2) The correct RNA and protein annotations of the SMAD6 variant in P128 are c.74_79del and p.Ser27_Gly28del, and not c.73_79del and p.Gly26_Ser27del. As a consequence, a correction has been made to RESULTS, Paragraphs 5 and 6: The SMAD6 c.726del variant leads to a frameshift (p.Lys242Asnfs*300) and a predicted protein with a C-terminal extension due to loss of the intended stop codon. The c.455_461del frameshift variant (p.Pro152Profs*27) causes the introduction of a premature stop codon, most likely resulting in haploinsufficiency due to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). Also the two nonsense variants (p.Tyr279* and p.Tyr288*) are predicted to lead to NMD. All of the missense variants cluster in the functionally important MH1 and MH2 domains (Makkar et al., 2009) (amino acids 148-275 and 331-496, respectively), which is not the case for the sole missense variant (p.Ser130Leu) found in a control individual (Figure 2). All but one (p.Arg443His) of the identified variants were absent in the ExAC control cohort (v0.3.1; Supplementary Table 2). Moreover, the missense variants in the patient cohort (7/7) are enriched in the MH1 and MH2 domains when compared to ExAC controls (n = 228/430; p = 0.02).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesFrench-language works237,207