MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765315715 · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.020

Urban Multi-scale Environmental Predictor (UMEP): An integrated tool for city-based climate services

2017· article· en· W2765315715 on OpenAlexaff
Fredrik Lindberg, Sue Grimmond, A. M. Gabey, Bei Huang, Christoph W. Kent, Ting Sun, Natalie Theeuwes, Leena Järvi, Helen C. Ward, Isabella Capel-Timms, Yuanyong Chang, Per R. Jonsson, Niklas Krave, Dongwei Liu, David E. Meyer, K. Frans G. Olofson, Jianguo Tan, Dag Wästberg, Lingbo Xue, Zhe Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Modelling & Software · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUniversity of ReadingVetenskapsrådetNatural Environment Research CouncilMet OfficeSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasSight Research UK
KeywordsScale (ratio)Environmental scienceClimate changeEnvironmental resource managementThermal comfortIdentification (biology)Urban heat islandEnergy consumptionMeteorologyEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UMEP (Urban Multi-scale Environmental Predictor), a city-based climate service tool, combines models and tools essential for climate simulations. Applications are presented to illustrate UMEP's potential in the identification of heat waves and cold waves; the impact of green infrastructure on runoff; the effects of buildings on human thermal stress; solar energy production; and the impact of human activities on heat emissions. UMEP has broad utility for applications related to outdoor thermal comfort, wind, urban energy consumption and climate change mitigation. It includes tools to enable users to input atmospheric and surface data from multiple sources, to characterise the urban environment, to prepare meteorological data for use in cities, to undertake simulations and consider scenarios, and to compare and visualise different combinations of climate indicators. An open-source tool, UMEP is designed to be easily updated as new data and tools are developed, and to be accessible to researchers, decision-makers and practitioners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations342
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Modelling & SoftwareSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207