MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A low-rank approach to off-the-grid sparse deconvolution

2017· article· en· W2765442055 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Catala, Vincent Duval, Gabriel Peyré

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionMathematicsDimension (graph theory)SolverConvex optimizationAlgorithmRank (graph theory)Blind deconvolutionMeasure (data warehouse)Mathematical optimizationRegular polygonCombinatoricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On s'intéresse à la résolution numérique du problème de déconvolution sans grille pour des mesures de Radon discrètes. Une approche courante consiste à introduire des relaxations semidéfinies positives (SDP) du problème variationnel associé, qui correspond ici à un problème de minimisation de variation totale. Cependant, pour des signaux de dimension supérieure à 1, les méthodes usuelles de points intérieurs sont peu efficaces pour résoudre le programme SDP correspondant, la taille de celui-ci étant de l'ordre de fc^{2d} où fc désigne la fréquence de coupure du filtre et d la dimension du signal. Nous introduisons en premier lieu une version pénalisée de la formulation SDP, dont les solutions sont de faible rang. Nous proposons ensuite un schéma numérique basé sur l'algorithme de Frank-Wolfe, capable d'exploiter efficacement d'une part cette propriété de faible rang, d'autre part l'aspect convolutif du problème; notre méthode atteint ainsi un coût de l'ordre de O(fc^d log fc) par itération. Nos simulations sont prometteuses, et montrent que l'algorithme converge en k étapes, k étant le nombre de Diracs dans la solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207