MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765480082 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.207

[P1–140]: ALZHEIMER's GENETIC RISK SCORE LINKED TO MILD BEHAVIORAL IMPAIRMENT

2017· article· en· W2765480082 on OpenAlexaff
Shea J. Andrews, Moyra E. Mortby, Zahinoor Ismail, Kaarin J. Anstey

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) defines a syndrome of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) that, in the absence of cognitive impairment, confer an increased risk of developing dementia (Ismail et al. 2016). It is well established that NPS typically increase with progression of late onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD). Examining the associations of LOAD genetic risk variants with endophenotypes of LOAD, such as MBI, can further elucidate role of genetic variants in the development of LOAD. This study is the first to examine the role of LOAD risk variants, individually and as a composite risk score, with MBI. 1377 older adults with normal cognition and preclinical cognition (aged 72–79; 738 males) from the PATH Through Life project (MCI=133; ‘cognitively normal, but-at-risk’ = 397; cognitively healthy = 847). MBI was assessed in accordance with the ISTAART-AA diagnostic criteria for MBI using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Participants were genotyped for SNPs at 25 LOAD risk loci (APOE, ABCA7, BIN1, CD2AP, CD33, CLU, CR1, EPHA1, MS4A4A, MS4A4E, MS4A6A, PICALM, HLA-DRB5, PTK2B, SORL1, SLC24A4-RIN3, DSG2, INPP5D, MEF2C, NME8, ZCWPW1, CELF1, FERMT2 and CASS4). Using the genotyped SNPs, a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) was constructed. Logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, years of education, and cognitive status examined the association between LOAD GRS and MBI domains. A 1SD increase in the LOAD GRS and APOE e4 were associated with higher odds of affective dysregulation (OR=1.23 [1.07–1.41], p=0.003; OR=1.60 [1.17–2.19], p=0.003); MS4A4A-rs4938933 and ZCWPW1-rs1476679 were linked to reduced odds of affective dysregulation (OR=0.78 [0.64–0.94], p=0.01) and social inappropriateness (OR=0.64 [0.41–0.96], p=0.03) respectively; BIN1-rs744373 and EPHA1-rs11767557 were associated with higher odds of abnormal perception/thought control (OR=2.58 [1.36–4.94], p=0.04; OR=2.2 [1.09–4.32], p=0.02). This is the first study to link a weighted AD GRS and five individual risk loci (APOE, MS4A4A, ZCWPW1, BIN1 and EPHA1) to risk of MBI in a large subclinical population-based sample. These findings suggest a common genetic etiology between MBI and traditionally recognized memory problems observed in dementia/AD. Identifying genetic risk factors for MBI will improve understanding of pathophysiological features underlying MBI and help optimize early identification and treatment to reduce dementia risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207