MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2765484233 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2317

[IC‐P‐045]: AMYLOID‐BETA MODULATES CEREBRAL METABOLIC NETWORK IN RATS AND HUMANS

2017· article· en· W2765484233 on OpenAlexaffabout
Min Su Kang, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Tharick A. Pascoal, Monica Shin, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Maxime Parent, Antonio Aliaga, Kok Pin Ng, Joseph Therriault, Hanne Struyfs, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Serge Gauthier, A. Claudio Cuello, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalConcordia UniversityMcGill Genome CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalTranslational Research in OncologyMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampusAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeAmyloid (mycology)Cognitive impairmentEntorhinal cortexNeuroscienceNeuroimagingAmyloid betaBETA (programming language)CohortAlzheimer's diseasePathophysiologyPositron emission tomographyInternal medicinePsychologyMedicinePathologyDiseaseCognitionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The amyloid hypothesis proposes that the amyloid pathology affects a series of downstream AD pathophysiology; changes in the brain metabolism, aggregation of neurofibrillary tangles, dysfunctional network, structural changes, and cognitive decline. This is supported by the typical pattern of amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition that overlaps with the regional hypometabolism based on FDG-PET. Felix et al. have reported abnormal metabolic network in MCI Aβ+ individuals compared to Aβ- individuals. However, the interregional association between Aβ and FDG as well as interregional metabolic network (IMN) is still elusive. Here, we used Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) database and McGill-R-Thy1-APP (Tg) to investigate the difference in IMN between Aβ+ and Aβ-. Furthermore, we characterized the difference in interregional association between Aβ and metabolism (IAMN) between Aβ+ and Aβ-. A total of 392 subjects from ADNI cohort (228 CN- = Aβ-, 164 MCI+ = Aβ+) was used and 17 (7 WT = Aβ-, 10 Tg = Aβ+) were used for this study. The ROC-based Aβ cut-off (1.286) was used to characterize CN- = Aβ- or MCI+ = Aβ+ from CN (287) and AD (176). Human IMN was generated based on the 201 nodes in 228 CN- and 164 MCI+. Rat IMN was generated based on 61 nodes in 7 WT and 10 Tg. The same regions were used to generate IAMN. Fisher's Z-transformation is applied to compare the network association between CN- and MCI+ as well as WT and Tg. MCI+ showed greater association compared to CN- in hippocampus, medial and lateral temporal cortex, superior parietal cortex, and fornix in IMN. Similarly, Tg showed greater association compared to WT in basal temporal cortex, parietotemporal cortex, and hypothalamus in IMN. Furthermore, regional Aβ association in lateral frontal cortex, lateral temporal cortex, and PCC/Precuneus in IMN metabolism were greater in MCI+ compared to CN-. Analogous regional Aβ associations were greater in Tg compared to WT in IMN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→