A Tool for Deadlock Analysis of Parameterized-chain Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies algorithmic aspects of deadlock analysis for parameterized networks of discrete-event systems. A parameterized network consists of interacting finite-state subsystems, including finite but arbitrarily large numbers of subsystems within each of a finite number of isomorphism classes. While deadlock analysis of such systems is generally undecidable, decidable subproblems have recently been identified. The decision procedure of Zibaeenejad and Thistle (2017) rests on the construction of a finite dependency graph for the network, and the computation of its full, consistent subgraphs. We present a software tool that takes the template of a Parameterized Chain Network (PCN) and outputs the set of all full, consistent subgraphs of the dependency graph. These subgraphs represent infinite set of deadlocked states of the PCN for all parameter values. As a case study, we investigate deadlock in a complex train network that extends beyond the current theoretical framework. The results suggest ways in which the framework could be extended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".