Fracture Initiation in Pressure Tube Specimens of Hydrided Irradiated Zr-2.5Nb Materials With Split Circumferential Hydrides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fracture initiation for axial cracks in pressure tube (PT) specimens of hydrided irradiated Zr-2.5Nb materials with split circumferential hydrides at room temperature is examined by conducting three-dimensional finite element analyses. With a strain-based fracture criterion with consideration of stress triaxiality, the location for the earliest crack initiation is determined near the middle of the axial crack front. For PT specimens with split circumferential hydrides, three types of strain concentration are observed in the ligaments ahead of the crack front. The computational results suggest that the internal pressure for crack initiation of hydrided irradiated PT specimens with many randomly distributed split circumferential hydrides needs only 55% to 70% of that for unhydrided irradiated PT specimens. The computational results can be used to explain the near 40% reduction of the fracture toughness at room temperature obtained from hydrided irradiated PT specimens when compared with that from unhydrided irradiated ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".