Inhibition of β-Amyloid Channels with a Drug Candidate wgx-50 Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Destabilization of cellular ionic homeostasis by toxic β-amyloid (Aβ) channels/barrels, which is a pathogenic mechanism for Alzheimer's disease (AD), is inhibited by a novel anti-AD drug candidate wgx-50 significantly in our previous biological experiments. In this work, molecular dynamics simulations are conducted to investigate wgx-50-Aβ channels/barrels interactions, as well as the ion conductance inhibition mechanism. Ion influx from the extracellular side to the central pore, which is found in apo-form simulations, is blocked by wgx-50 ligands that bind to the hydrophobic rings at the entrance of the channels/barrels. The wgx-50 binding results in smaller pore diameter of the channels/barrels; however, the overall morphology of them remains unaffected in accessible simulation time. The wgx-50 binding site in this work is consistent with what we found in our previous simulations of Aβ protofibril. Our work not only investigates the ligand-Aβ channels/barrels interaction mechanism but also provides insights into the rational drug design of Alzheimer's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".