MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765533217

TRATAMIENTO PSICOLÓGICO CON CELULARES Y COMPUTADORAS. PLATAFORMA PARA NIÑOS, EN UN AÑO

2017· article· es· W2765533217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonardo Frías

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2010-2019) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCartographyPsychologyArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EL DIVAN, EL INTERROGATORIO Y LA ORIEN­TACION VERBAL DE LOS PROFESIONALES DE LA SALUD MENTAL SERAN CADA VEZ MAS COMPLEMENTADOS CON HERRA­MIENTAS TECNOLOGICAS, EN PARTICULAR DE REALIDAD VIRTUAL Y SUS APLICACIONES PARA LOS TRATAMIENTOS, COINCIDIERON ACADEMI­COS Y ESPECIALISTAS EN EL QUINTO FORO DE CIBERPSICOLOGIA, ORGANIZADO POR LA UNAM, MEDIANTE LA FACULTAD DE PSICOLOGIA (FP). REALIZADA EN LA UNIDAD DE CONGRESOS DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE MEDICINA GE­NOMICA, LA REUNION INTERNACIONAL CONTO CON TRES SIMPOSIOS Y CUATRO CONFERENCIAS MAGISTRALES, ENTRE LAS QUE DESTACO LA IM­PARTIDA POR STEPHANE BOUCHARD DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE QUEBEC, QUIEN ASEVERO QUE NO HAY MARCHA ATRAS EN LA RELACION ENTRE LA TECNOLOGIA Y LA SALUD MENTAL. “LA TECNOLOGIA PUEDE HACER LLEGAR LOS TRATAMIENTOS A LAS PERSONAS POR MUCHOS MEDIOS: TELEFONOS CELULARES, COMPUTADO­RAS, IMPLANTES, LO QUE HARA QUE CUALQUIER PACIENTE SEA BENEFICIADO CON LO QUE SE ESTA DESARROLLANDO EN ESTE AMBITO”, INDICO. AUNQUE LAS APLICACIONES SON CADA VEZ MAS ACCESIBLES, EN CINCO ANOS ESTO SERA MUCHO MAS EVIDENTE, ANADIO. COMO PARTE DE ESTE EVENTO, COPATRO­CINADO POR LA FUNDACION RIO ARRONTE, GEORGINA CARDENAS LOPEZ, RESPONSABLE DE LA REUNION Y DIREC­TORA DEL LABORATORIO DE ENSENANZA VIRTUAL Y CIBERPSICOLOGIA DE LA FP, ANUNCIO QUE EN ENERO DE 2018 ESTARA LISTA LA PRIMERA PLATAFORMA VIRTUAL PARA NINOS TESTIGOS DE LA VIOLENCIA, DE 8 A 12 ANOS DE EDAD. EN EL FORO, INAUGURADO POR GER­MAN PALAFOX PALAFOX, DIRECTOR DE LA FP, PARTICIPARON TAMBIEN MARIANO ALCANIZ RAYA, INVESTIGADOR DE LA UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA, ESPANA, Y ALBERT RIZZO, DIRECTOR DEL LABORATORIO DE REALIDAD VIRTUAL MEDICA DEL INSTITUTO PARA TECNOLOGIAS CREATIVAS DE LA UNIVER­SIDAD DEL SUR DE CALIFORNIA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2010-2019)Same topicPsychology Research and BibliometricsFrench-language works237,207