MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765588505 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx187.671

Methadone therapy adherence among homeless adults in a housing first trial in Vancouver, Canada

2017· article· en· W2765588505 on OpenAlexaffabout
Milad Parpouchi, Akm Moniruzzaman, Stefanie N. Rezansoff, Angela Russolillo, Julian M. Somers

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethadonePsychiatryMedicineHousing FirstGerontologyMental healthMental illness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Adherence to methadone substitution therapy (MST) is an important factor for successful treatment of opioid dependence. Homelessness is a known structural impediment to medication adherence, but no studies have examined MST adherence, or the effect of supported housing (e.g., Housing First [HF]), on such adherence, among homeless populations. HF includes housing with medical and social services. This study will address the following research questions: 1) What is the rate of MST adherence among homeless people? 2) What is the effect of HF on MST adherence? With a rising opioid overdose death rate in many communities around the world, such research is critical to inform MST programs and social policy for prevention. Methods Homeless adults living with mental illness were referred to the Vancouver At Home (VAH) study, as participants, by a variety of health and social services between October 2009 and June 2011. VAH is a randomized controlled trial investigating the health and social effects of HF. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated to represent adherence. Administrative data were used to estimate MST adherence during the pre (the 15-year period prior to recruitment) and post-randomization period. An independent sample t-test was conducted to evaluate the two-year impact of receiving HF on MST adherence compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Results The mean MPR for MST was .47 prior to randomization and .54 during the post-randomization period. HF was not significantly associated with MST adherence (mean MPR difference between HF and TAU = .05; p=.559). Conclusions MST adherence among participants was very low and may pose increased risks for opioid overdose. Although HF did not have a significant effect on MST adherence, housing and supports are likely needed to counter the barriers homelessness creates for medication adherence. However, further interventions are needed to increase MST adherence among homeless adults experiencing mental illness. Key messages: Adherence to methadone substitution therapy is very low among homeless adults living with mental illness, and may increase the risk of opioid overdose. Housing First was not associated with adherence to methadone substitution therapy, and interventions are in urgent need to increase adherence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207