MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765649685 · doi:10.1121/2.0000071

Classifying and removing unwanted arrivals propagating through a drill collar for semblance processing

2015· article· en· W2765649685 on OpenAlexaff
Naoki Sakiyama, Alain Dumont, Wataru Izuhara, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Takeshi Fukushima, Makito Katayama

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of meetings on acoustics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlownessCollarDrillGeologyAcousticsShear (geology)Shear wavesSeismic waveDrillingSeismologyEngineeringStructural engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the characteristics of an acoustic wave propagating through drill collars is important for formation evaluation with logging-while-drilling (LWD) sonic tools. Knowing the frequency-slowness information of different types of waves propagating through the collar, the unwanted wave propagations can be minimized by processing and robustly identifying the formation compressional and shear arrivals. Extensional modes of the steel drill collar in water are generally dispersive and range from approximately 40 μs/ft to approximately 120 μs/ft depending on the frequency band. A fundamental torsional mode of the drill collar is nondispersive, but its slowness is sensitive to the geometry of the drill collar. Depending on the geometry and shear modulus of the material, the slowness of the torsional mode can be slower than 100 μs/ft. For identifying the slowness of the formation arrivals, the different slownesses of the waves propagating through the collar need to be identified separately from those of the wave propagating through the formation. By examining the various types of acoustic waves propagating through a drill collar, it was determined that the waves can be properly muted for semblance processing with LWD sonic tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of meetings on acousticsSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207