Abdominal Abscess due to Perforation of the Terminal Ieum Caused by a Fish Bone Treated by the Conservative Treatment Using Antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accidental ingestion of the foreign bodies rarely develops the perforation of gastrointestinal tract, and the perforation of gastrointestinal tract can lead to severe complications such as abscess, enteric fistula, or intestinal obstruction, and peritonitis. As the standard management for foreign body-induced bowel perforation, surgery is commonly selected. We experienced a patient whose abdominal abscess is due to perforation of the terminal ileum by a fish bone. Streptococcus intermedius was isolated from abdominal abscess. An absence of fistula between intestinal tract and abscess and a remarkable improvement of laboratory data and symptoms by using antibiotics made us select the conservative treatment. In conclusion, we succeeded to treat conservatively abdominal abscess due to perforation by a fish bone by using appropriately selected antibiotics. J Med Cases. 2017;8(11):361-364 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc2930e
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".