MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765787022

Material properties and cover options using HYDRUS (2D/3D) for a large undrained sand dam in northern Alberta, Canada.

2017· dissertation· en· W2765787022 on OpenAlex
M.L. Goddard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUtrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeotechnical engineeringCover (algebra)EngineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A flow and transport model was built to simulate the Southwest Sands Storage facility, which is a large oil sands tailings dam and impoundment located on the Mildred Lake oil sands lease in northern Alberta, Canada. Studying the flushing behavior and advancing the material characterization was achieved by building a two-dimensional cross section of 3000 m long and 40 m high (approx. 58,500 m2 in area) using HYDRUS (2D/3D). Building upon more than a decade’s worth of data and work by others, this study synthesised the existing material characteristics, corroborated and refined them, and performed future simulations.\nThe use of a variable (transient) boundary condition was invaluable to gaining insights into the material characteristics of oil sands tailings; a unique material. The horizontal hydraulic conductivity ranged between 0.137 m/d to 1.27 m/d and the anisotropy ratio was restrained between 1 and 20, in line with reference values. The porosity ranged between 0.35 and 0.40 which was also inline with previous works. The residual saturation ranged between 0.13 and 0.2 which was double to triple the reference values, however an evaluation of the reference Soil Water Characteristics Charts revealed curves without distinct inflection points and therefore difficult to determine a precise residual saturation value. These tailings curves start to break between 0.05 and 0.15 then gradually decline with increasing suction. The van Genuchten unsaturated parameters (alpha = 1.24, n = 1.7) were unique in comparison to those in the agricultural soils databases but within the range of previously reported values for dyke and tailings sand.\nThe parallel use of both a constant and a variable water flux boundary condition allowed for comparison of the future simulation results, which were of high fidelity. Under the as-is scenario (Future I) the TDS concentration of the dam will be greater than 1000 mg/L until around 2075, but because of the presence of the pond, two-thirds of the model section does not attenuate. Future simulations with remedial covers and landscaping (Futures II and III) had more holistic TDS attenuation distributions with dilution proportional to the amount of recharge. However, even the most restrictive recharge produces TDS concentrations of less than 1000 mg/L at the perimeter ditch after about 60 years due to the local flow system on Benches B and A and the influence of the Toe C ditch. \nRecharge rates are very important to reclamation success with topography and vegetation playing key roles. The competition for precipitation, which averages between 450 mm and 500 mm per year, in an area with high evaporation rates, means that the ideal cover should capture and transmit as much precipitation as possible. The transmissivity of the cover will be key to meeting the specific remedial goals and timelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it