MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765834554 · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12714-8

A comparative Raman study between PrMnO 3, NdMnO 3, TbMnO 3 and DyMnO 3

2017· article· en· W2765834554 on OpenAlex
S. Mansouri, S. Jandl, V. Yu. Ivanov, Anatoly M. Balbashov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de PointeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiferroicsRaman spectroscopyPhononCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceCoupling (piping)Field (mathematics)Magnetic fieldPhysicsMaterials scienceFerroelectricityQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we present a detailed Raman study of the non-multiferroic compounds PrMnO 3 and NdMnO 3 and the multiferroic compounds TbMnO 3 and DyMnO 3 as a function of temperature and magnetic field. All studied systems show anomalous phonon shifts close to the Néel transition T N . In PrMnO 3 and NdMnO 3 , the frequency softenings are partly attributed to an orbital-spin-phonon coupling whereas in TbMnO 3 and DyMnO 3 , the relatively weak frequency shifts are rather attributed to an expansion of the Mn − O bond lengths. On the other hand, the frequencies of TbMnO 3 phonons are shifted as a function of magnetic field, while those of PrMnO 3 remain unaffected. These frequency shifts are interpreted in terms of local oxygen rearrangements under magnetic field that could play an important role in the multiferroicity of TbMnO 3 and DyMnO 3 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it