MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765882084 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01232

Probing the Coordination Chemistry of <i>N</i>-2-Pyridylimidoyl-2-pyridylamidine: A Versatile Ligand with Multiple Coordination Sites

2017· article· en· W2765882084 on OpenAlexafffund
Raúl Castañeda, Andrew Hollingshead, Bulat Gabidullin, Jaclyn L. Brusso

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Innovation FoundationOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Science CouncilUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsDenticityCoordination complexChemistryLigand (biochemistry)MetalCoordination numberCrystallographyStereochemistryIonOrganic chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research presented herein focuses on controlling the coordination environment of Mn, Fe, and Co in coordination complexes with the ligand N -2-pyridylimidoyl-2-pyridylamidine ( Py 2 ImAm ), which possesses both a bidentate and tridentate coordinating site. The synthesis and characterization of seven new metallic complexes are described, and these results indicate that the key factor dictating which coordination site of Py 2 ImAm the metal ion prefers is the presence (or absence) of a weak acid. More specifically, the presence of a weak acid directs the metal ion to the tridentate site of Py 2 ImAm, while neutral or basic conditions lead to coordination complexes in which the metal center is bound to the bidentate pocket.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207