MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2765969986 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2346

[IC‐P‐073]: CEREBRAL 18F‐FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE‐POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN PROLONGED DELIRIUM

2017· article· en· W2765969986 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Malo Pion, Jessica Nehme, Josée Filion, Philippe Desmarais, Hélène Masson, Marie‐Andrée Bruneau, Jean‐Paul Soucy

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversity of TorontoConcordia UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersMenzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityNewcastle University
KeywordsDeliriumDementiaMedicineNeuroimagingPositron emission tomographyInternal medicineDiseasePediatricsPsychiatryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delirium, an acute neuropsychiatric disorder frequently seen in hospitalized elderly patients, is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline. It remains unclear if that risk is linked to acceleration by delirium of pre-existing disease, possibly increasing in itself the risk of delirium under physiological stress, and if so whether certain specific conditions are more likely to be involved. To begin clarifying this, we analyzed the cerebral FDG PET (CPET) patterns reported in patients with prolonged delirium. We retrospectively reviewed cerebral CPET studies in hospitalized patients who presented prolonged (>7 days) delirium according to the Confusion Assessment Method criteria between 01/2012 and 12/2015 at CHUM. Subjects had to be > 65 years old and without a history of dementia, idiopathic Parkinson's disease, or significant psychiatric disorder. They were age and sex matched with randomly selected outpatient controls imaged with CPET for evaluation of cognitive impairment. Imaging studies were re-interpreted by 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians trained in neuroimaging, blinded to clinical diagnosis. We reviewed 1604 files, with 28 meeting inclusion criteria (mean age: 81 ± 8, 64% male). Although not statistically significant, patients with delirium were more likely to show a scintigraphic pattern of neurodegenerative disease than controls (89 % vs. 68%, p = 0.101). Alzheimer's was the most frequent diagnosis for both groups (17 in the delirium group, 10 controls; p = 0,108). The scintigraphic pattern was compatible with Lewy body pathology in 9 patients with prolonged delirium compared to only 1 in controls (32% vs. 4%, p = 0.012). Moreover, the scintigraphic pattern was suggestive of co-occurring neural pathologies in 18 cases of patients with prolonged delirium while only 8 controls were so classified (64% vs. 29%, p = 0.015). The frequency of a PET-defined neurodegenerative condition in patients with an episode of prolonged delirium is high but similar to that of outpatients with cognitive deterioration. However, the repartition across neurodegenerative processes encountered in the prolonged delirium group differs from that of controls, with Lewy body disease and mixed pathologies being over-represented in the delirium group; AD remains the most frequent diagnosis in both groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→