Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Steam Generator Tubing Subject to Dealloying Degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new degradation mechanism has been observed in Monel 400 Steam Generator tubing material, a nickel-copper alloy (63Ni-28Cu-2½Fe) with the ASME material designation SB-163/N04400. The location is above the top preheater support plate of the two re-circulating steam generator in one of the units of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. This paper provides a brief description of the regulatory environment, OPG’s steam generator life cycle management plans, the Canadian Industry’s fitness-for-service guidelines for steam generator tubes, and the afflicted steam generators. The paper then goes on to discuss the following activities that were conducted to support the technical basis to justify that the steam generators fit to be returned to service: • Inspection scope expansion, methods, and results. • Examination of removed tubes. • Condition monitoring assessment. • Operational assessment. • Burst-pressure tests of removed tubes and of fabricated test specimens. • Degradation specific flaw model and acceptance standards. • Flaw growth rate predictions. • Plugging limit adopted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".